CARC 152 Active

CO-152: Information Does Not Support Length of Service

TL;DR

Provider responsibility — gather documentation and appeal if the denial is in error. The patient is not liable for this amount.

Action
Appeal
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-152 Mean?

With CO (Contractual Obligation), the CARC 152 denial for information does not support length of service is the provider's contractual responsibility. The patient is not liable for this amount. However, the provider may appeal with supporting clinical or administrative documentation if the denial is believed to be in error.

CARC 152 indicates information does not support length of service. The payer determined that the service or a portion of it does not meet coverage criteria under the patient's current plan benefits or the applicable coverage rules.

Common scenarios that trigger this adjustment include: the payer determines the length of the inpatient stay exceeds what is medically necessary based on the diagnosis and clinical documentation, and reduces payment to cover only the approved number of days; The clinical documentation does not adequately support the duration of the treatment or service, such as prolonged therapy sessions or extended observation periods; The billed service duration exceeds the payer's established time limits for that procedure or service category. The group code paired with CARC 152 determines who bears the financial responsibility — CO places it on the provider as a contractual obligation, PR shifts it to the patient, OA indicates a coordination of benefits or other payer adjustment.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Inpatient stay exceeds medically necessary duration The payer determines the length of the inpatient stay exceeds what is medically necessary based on the diagnosis and clinical documentation, and reduces payment to cover only the approved number of days Most Common
Insufficient documentation for extended treatment duration The clinical documentation does not adequately support the duration of the treatment or service, such as prolonged therapy sessions or extended observation periods Most Common
Service duration exceeds payer's time-based limits The billed service duration exceeds the payer's established time limits for that procedure or service category Common
Utilization review determines shorter length of stay The payer's utilization review process concluded that the patient could have been safely discharged earlier or transitioned to a lower level of care sooner Common
Missing concurrent review or continued stay authorization The provider did not obtain required concurrent review or continued stay authorization for the extended length of service Common

How to Resolve

  1. Review the denial Examine the CO-152 denial and any RARC codes to understand the specific basis for the coverage determination.
  2. Gather supporting documentation Collect medical records, clinical notes, authorization documents, or other evidence that supports the medical necessity or coverage of the denied service.
  3. File the appeal Appeal with detailed clinical documentation supporting the medical necessity for the full length of service, including daily progress notes, clinical assessments, evidence of clinical instability or deterioration that prevented earlier discharge, and the discharge planning timeline.
  4. Track the appeal outcome Monitor the appeal status and follow up as needed. If denied again, consider further levels of appeal if available.
Appeal Guide

Appeal with detailed clinical documentation supporting the medical necessity for the full length of service, including daily progress notes, clinical assessments, evidence of clinical instability or deterioration that prevented earlier discharge, and the discharge planning timeline.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-152:

RARC Description
N130 You may need to review plan documents or guidelines Review the payer's length-of-stay guidelines for the specific diagnosis or service →
N386 This decision was based on a utilization review Request the utilization review determination and appeal with additional clinical documentation if warranted →

How to Prevent CO-152

Also Filed As

The same CARC 152 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://www.mdclarity.com/denial-code-carcs
  2. https://x12.org/codes/claim-adjustment-reason-codes
  3. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ohs/health-it-advisory-council/apcd-advisory-group/data-submission-guide-workgroup/meeting-materials/6-30-22/carc-codes_final.pdf
  4. https://medicaid-documents.dhhs.utah.gov/Documents/pdfs/ClaimDenialCodes.pdf
  5. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.