CARC 219 Active

CO-219: Based on Extent of Injury

TL;DR

The payer assessed the injury as less severe. Appeal with clinical evidence supporting the actual extent of injury.

Action
Appeal
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-219 Mean?

With CO (Contractual Obligation), the injury extent assessment resulted in a contractual adjustment. Appeal with clinical documentation supporting the severity of the injury.

CARC 219 indicates the payer reduced or denied the claim based on their determination of the extent of the patient's injury. This code is most common in workers compensation and liability insurance contexts where the payer evaluates the severity of the injury and the appropriateness of treatment relative to that severity.

The payer may have determined that the treatment provided exceeded what was reasonable given the injury's extent, or that the injury has reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) and further treatment is not warranted. This code often involves clinical assessment by the payer's medical review team.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Treatment exceeds the scope of the compensable injury The payer determined that the services provided go beyond what is related to or necessitated by the extent of the original injury Most Common
Disputed extent of injury in workers compensation The workers compensation insurer disputes whether the claimed condition is causally related to the original work injury Most Common
Secondary condition not accepted as injury-related A secondary condition that developed after the initial injury is not accepted by the payer as being within the extent of the original compensable injury Common
Maximum medical improvement (MMI) reached The payer determined the patient has reached maximum medical improvement and further treatment is not related to the extent of the original injury Common
Treatment for pre-existing condition attributed to injury The payer determined that the services are for a pre-existing condition rather than the extent of the covered injury Occasional

How to Resolve

  1. Obtain the injury assessment Get the payer's specific determination about injury severity.
  2. Compile clinical evidence Gather imaging, functional assessments, and specialist reports.
  3. Appeal with documentation Submit all evidence demonstrating the injury's actual severity.
Appeal Guide

Appeal with comprehensive medical documentation linking the treatment to the original injury. Include physician statements establishing causal relationship, diagnostic imaging, treatment records, and any independent medical examination reports. In workers compensation cases, file a dispute with the state workers compensation board if the payer appeal is denied.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-219:

RARC Description
N381 Alert: Consult your contractual agreement for restrictions, billing, and payment information. Review the workers compensation or liability policy for extent of injury coverage limitations →
N386 This decision was based on a National Coverage Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage Determination (LCD). Review the applicable coverage determination regarding the extent of injury →

How to Prevent CO-219

General Prevention

Also Filed As

The same CARC 219 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://x12.org/codes/claim-adjustment-reason-codes
  2. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ohs/health-it-advisory-council/apcd-advisory-group/data-submission-guide-workgroup/meeting-materials/6-30-22/carc-codes_final.pdf
  3. https://www.wcb.ny.gov/CMS-1500/WCB-CARC-RARC-codes.pdf
  4. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.