CARC 95 Active

CO-95: Plan Procedures Not Followed

TL;DR

The provider is liable for not following the plan's required procedures. Obtain retroactive authorization if possible, or appeal with emergency documentation. Do not bill the patient.

Action
Verify & Resubmit
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-95 Mean?

CO-95 places the financial burden on the provider. The payer is saying your practice failed to follow a required plan procedure — typically by not obtaining prior authorization or by rendering a service that required a referral without one on file. Under your contract, you agreed to follow these procedures, and the payer is holding you to that commitment. You cannot bill the patient for CO-95 denials.

When CARC 95 appears on a remittance, the payer is telling you that someone — either the provider or the patient — did not follow a required procedural step outlined in the insurance plan before the service was delivered. This is one of the most preventable denial codes in medical billing because it almost always traces back to a verification gap in the pre-service workflow.

The most frequent trigger is a missing prior authorization. The payer required pre-approval for the service, and the authorization was not obtained before care was rendered. Missing referrals are the second most common cause, particularly for plans that require a primary care physician referral before the patient can see a specialist. Non-compliance with step therapy protocols, where the payer requires the patient to try lower-cost treatments before more expensive ones, is another trigger.

The group code paired with CARC 95 determines the financial impact. CO-95 places the responsibility on the provider — you rendered the service without following the required plan procedure, and your contract holds you liable. PR-95 places it on the patient — they sought care without obtaining their plan's required referral or following other member-side procedures. In both cases, the accompanying RARC code will specify exactly which plan procedure was not followed, so always read the remark code before deciding on your resolution strategy.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Missing prior authorization The provider failed to obtain the required pre-authorization or precertification from the payer before delivering the service, and the payer denies the claim as a contractual obligation since the provider agreed to follow authorization protocols Most Common
Referral not obtained The patient's plan requires a referral from the primary care physician before seeing a specialist, and the provider rendered services without confirming the referral was in place Common
Non-compliance with payer clinical guidelines The provider used a treatment method, medication, or procedure that does not align with the payer's approved clinical pathways or step therapy requirements Common
Inadequate documentation of medical necessity The clinical documentation submitted does not sufficiently support the medical necessity of the service according to the payer's criteria, even though the procedure may have been appropriate Common
Missed filing deadline for authorization The provider submitted the prior authorization request after the payer's deadline or failed to obtain retroactive authorization within the allowed timeframe Occasional

How to Resolve

Identify the specific plan procedure that was missed, attempt to satisfy it retroactively, and either resubmit or appeal with supporting documentation.

  1. Identify the missed procedure Review the RARC to determine whether the issue is a missing prior authorization, referral, step therapy requirement, or other plan procedure.
  2. Request retroactive authorization Contact the payer's utilization management department and request retroactive authorization. Provide clinical documentation, medical records, and a clinical rationale supporting the necessity of the service.
  3. Resubmit with authorization Once retroactive authorization is granted, resubmit the claim with the authorization number. If denied retroactively, proceed to formal appeal.
  4. File a formal appeal Submit a written appeal with the medical record, clinical documentation, and a letter explaining why the plan procedure was not followed and why the service was medically necessary.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-95:

RARC Description
N657 This should be billed with the appropriate prior authorization or referral number. Obtain and resubmit.
N386 This decision was based on a plan of care or pre-authorization/pre-certification requirement.
MA130 Your claim contains incomplete or invalid information, and no appeal rights are afforded because the claim was unprocessable.

How to Prevent CO-95

General Prevention

Also Filed As

The same CARC 95 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://www.mdclarity.com/denial-code/95
  2. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ohs/health-it-advisory-council/apcd-advisory-group/data-submission-guide-workgroup/meeting-materials/6-30-22/carc-codes_final.pdf
  3. https://carecloud.com/continuum/denial-codes-in-medical-billing/
  4. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.