CARC 150 Active

CO-150: Information Does Not Support Level of Service

TL;DR

Provider responsibility — gather documentation and appeal if the denial is in error. The patient is not liable for this amount.

Action
Appeal
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-150 Mean?

With CO (Contractual Obligation), the CARC 150 denial for information does not support level of service is the provider's contractual responsibility. The patient is not liable for this amount. However, the provider may appeal with supporting clinical or administrative documentation if the denial is believed to be in error.

CARC 150 indicates information does not support level of service. The payer determined that the service or a portion of it does not meet coverage criteria under the patient's current plan benefits or the applicable coverage rules.

Common scenarios that trigger this adjustment include: the clinical documentation does not demonstrate the medical necessity or complexity required to justify the level of service billed, such as billing a level 5 E/M when documentation supports only a level 3; The payer's review determined that the service was billed at a higher level than the documentation supports, resulting in a downgrade or denial; Required medical records, progress notes, or clinical documentation that would support the billed level of service were not submitted with the claim or upon request. The group code paired with CARC 150 determines who bears the financial responsibility — CO places it on the provider as a contractual obligation, PR shifts it to the patient, OA indicates a coordination of benefits or other payer adjustment.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Insufficient documentation to support the billed level of service The clinical documentation does not demonstrate the medical necessity or complexity required to justify the level of service billed, such as billing a level 5 E/M when documentation supports only a level 3 Most Common
Upcoding detected by payer The payer's review determined that the service was billed at a higher level than the documentation supports, resulting in a downgrade or denial Most Common
Missing or incomplete medical records Required medical records, progress notes, or clinical documentation that would support the billed level of service were not submitted with the claim or upon request Common
Payer's clinical guidelines differ from provider's assessment The payer applies stricter clinical criteria for the level of service than what the provider used, resulting in a determination that a lower level of service was appropriate Common
Incorrect E/M level selection The provider selected the wrong E/M code level based on the documentation of medical decision-making, history, and examination complexity Common

How to Resolve

  1. Review the denial Examine the CO-150 denial and any RARC codes to understand the specific basis for the coverage determination.
  2. Gather supporting documentation Collect medical records, clinical notes, authorization documents, or other evidence that supports the medical necessity or coverage of the denied service.
  3. File the appeal Appeal with comprehensive clinical documentation including progress notes, medical decision-making details, time documentation, and any additional records supporting the billed level of service. Reference the payer's specific clinical criteria and explain how the documentation meets each requirement.
  4. Track the appeal outcome Monitor the appeal status and follow up as needed. If denied again, consider further levels of appeal if available.
Appeal Guide

Appeal with comprehensive clinical documentation including progress notes, medical decision-making details, time documentation, and any additional records supporting the billed level of service. Reference the payer's specific clinical criteria and explain how the documentation meets each requirement.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-150:

RARC Description
N130 You may need to review plan documents or guidelines Review the payer's clinical guidelines for the billed level of service to understand the downgrade criteria →
M20 Missing/incomplete/invalid HCPCS Verify the HCPCS or CPT code billed matches the documentation and resubmit if incorrect →

How to Prevent CO-150

Also Filed As

The same CARC 150 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://www.mdclarity.com/denial-code/150
  2. https://www.sprypt.com/denial-codes/co-150
  3. https://x12.org/codes/claim-adjustment-reason-codes
  4. https://medicaid-documents.dhhs.utah.gov/Documents/pdfs/ClaimDenialCodes.pdf
  5. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.