CARC 90 Active

CO-90: Ingredient Cost Adjustment

TL;DR

Provider responsibility — correct the issue and resubmit the claim. The patient is not liable for this amount.

Action
Verify & Resubmit
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-90 Mean?

With CO (Contractual Obligation), the CARC 90 adjustment is the provider's responsibility. The payer denied or reduced payment because of the pharmacy or provider billed an ingredient cost higher than the payer's MAC pricing list, and the payer adjusted the payment down to the MAC rate. The patient is not liable for this amount. If the denial is in error, the provider can correct and resubmit the claim or file an appeal with supporting documentation.

CARC 90 means the payer adjusted the payment based on ingredient cost adjustment. The reimbursement was calculated using the payer's fee schedule, contracted rate, or regulatory payment methodology rather than the billed charge.

Common scenarios that trigger this adjustment include: the pharmacy or provider billed an ingredient cost higher than the payer's MAC pricing list, and the payer adjusted the payment down to the MAC rate; The billed ingredient cost was based on a different pricing benchmark than the payer uses, such as AWP vs. ASP (Average Sales Price), resulting in a downward adjustment; A generic equivalent is available at a lower ingredient cost, and the payer adjusted the payment to the generic pricing level per formulary rules. The group code paired with CARC 90 determines who bears the financial responsibility — CO places it on the provider as a contractual obligation, OA indicates a coordination of benefits or other payer adjustment, PR shifts it to the patient.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Billed ingredient cost exceeds payer's Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) The pharmacy or provider billed an ingredient cost higher than the payer's MAC pricing list, and the payer adjusted the payment down to the MAC rate Most Common
Average Wholesale Price (AWP) or ASP pricing discrepancy The billed ingredient cost was based on a different pricing benchmark than the payer uses, such as AWP vs. ASP (Average Sales Price), resulting in a downward adjustment Most Common
Generic substitution available A generic equivalent is available at a lower ingredient cost, and the payer adjusted the payment to the generic pricing level per formulary rules Common
Compound medication ingredient cost dispute For compound medications, the payer's calculated ingredient cost for individual components differs from the billed amount Common
Unit quantity or dosage billing error The billed quantity or dosage of the drug was incorrect, causing the calculated ingredient cost to be higher than the payer's allowed amount Occasional

How to Resolve

  1. Review the remittance details Examine the CO-90 adjustment and any accompanying RARC codes to identify the specific reason for the denial.
  2. Identify the root cause Determine which issue applies: billed ingredient cost exceeds payer's Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC), average Wholesale Price (AWP) or ASP pricing discrepancy, generic substitution available, among others.
  3. Correct the claim Address the identified issue — update the claim data in your billing system to resolve the ingredient cost adjustment problem.
  4. Resubmit the corrected claim Submit the corrected claim following the payer's resubmission guidelines. Include any supporting documentation that addresses the denial reason.
  5. Appeal if the original claim was correct Appeal with documentation of actual acquisition cost (invoices) if the payer's MAC or ASP rate is lower than your cost. Include the NDC code, quantity dispensed, supplier invoice, and contractual pricing terms. For Medicare Part B drugs, reference the applicable ASP pricing file.
Appeal Guide

Appeal with documentation of actual acquisition cost (invoices) if the payer's MAC or ASP rate is lower than your cost. Include the NDC code, quantity dispensed, supplier invoice, and contractual pricing terms. For Medicare Part B drugs, reference the applicable ASP pricing file.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-90:

RARC Description
N381 Consult your contractual agreement for drug pricing and ingredient cost reimbursement rules Review your contractual agreement for billing restrictions and payment terms for this service →
N517 Payment adjusted based on the Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) for the ingredient Compare your billed ingredient cost to the payer's MAC list and update pricing accordingly →

How to Prevent CO-90

Also Filed As

The same CARC 90 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/part-b-drugs/average-sales-price
  2. https://www.aapc.com/resources/claim-adjustment-reason-code-carc
  3. https://www.mdclarity.com/denial-code/90
  4. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.